Print/Press Workflow With a Novel Silicate Ceramic Material: A Case Report
Jose Maria Ayub, DDS; Telmo Santos, CDT; Mauricio Figueredo, DDS; Julian Conejo, DDS, MSc; and Markus B. Blatz, DMD, PhD
Abstract: Digital technology that utilizes 3D printing has become a viable alternative to the traditional fabrication of wax patterns and definitive restorations for pressable ceramics. Digital workflows afford clinicians fewer variables, improved repeatability, and faster design and fabrication times. The print/press technique for producing zirconia-reinforced lithium-disilicate restorations offers benefits in terms of convenience, precision, and improved mechanical properties. This article describes an efficient workflow for monolithic ceramic restorations using the print/press technique and a novel zirconia-reinforced silicate ceramic.
Lithium-disilicate ceramic restorations have gained popularity due to their excellent esthetic and mechanical properties.1 These restorations can be fabricated using either computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) procedures or lost-wax techniques.2 Pressed restorations have been found to have significantly better marginal fit accuracy compared to those milled from lithium-disilicate blocks.3-5 However, the conventional fabrication of wax patterns for pressed restorations has several drawbacks, including time consumption, technique sensitivity, and potential inaccuracies in the wax pattern, which can affect the final restoration quality.2,5
The use of digital systems, such as 3D printing, has been developed as an alternative method for the traditional fabrication of wax patterns and definitive restorations. CAD/CAM-generated restorations provide technicians more facilities during the fabrication process, with fewer variables, ensuring greater repeatability and reliability in the restorations. CAD/CAM also minimizes the time required for design and production, making it a more efficient alternative to traditional methods.6
The print/press technique involves creating a 3D-printed wax pattern, which is then used to form a mold for pressing ceramic materials. This dual approach combines the accuracy of digital design with the material properties of ceramics. This article describes a workflow for monolithic ceramic restorations using the print/press technique and a novel zirconia-reinforced silicate ceramic.
Clinical Case Report
A 33-year-old female patient presented with severe wear on her maxillary teeth due to bruxism and acid erosion. After clinical and radiographic analysis, ceramic restorations were chosen to close diastemas and restore function and esthetics (Figure 1 through Figure 3).
Intraoral scans were taken and sent to a smile design planning center in Madrid, Spain (DSD Planning Center, digitalsmiledesign.com), where facial parameters were analyzed and a final 3D smile design was created (Figure 4). The virtual design was approved by the practitioner.
A 3D-printed (Form 3+ printer, Formlabs, formlabs.com) model (Model Resin V2, Formlabs) from the digital wax-up made by the planning center was used to create two silicone indexes (Panasil®, Kettenbach Dental, kettenbach-dental.us), one to serve as a tooth reduction guide and the other for fabrication of provisional restorations. Another 3D-printed model was used to create a silicone index to transfer the digital wax-up into a mockup on the patient (Figure 5).
Because of severe wear of the incisal edges, acid erosion on the palatal surfaces, and the presence of diastemas between the anterior teeth, the maxillary central and lateral incisors and canines were prepared for 360-degree laminate veneers using a conservative full-coverage design. The maxillary premolars and first molars were prepared for facial-occlusal laminate veneers using cutting burs of 0.3-mm depth facially and 1-mm depth occlusally/incisally. This preparation approach facilitated enamel conservation for partial- and full-coverage restorations (Figure 6 to Figure 8).
Subsequently, a digital intraoral final impression was made using a powder-free scanner (TRIOS 3, 3Shape, 3shape.com) and exported to a dental laboratory through the scanner software's specific connection portal where the final restorations were designed with a CAD software (Inlab 19, Dentsply Sirona, dentsplysirona.com) (Figure 9). Specific 3D printing resins with high wax content (Castable Wax 40 Resin, Formlabs) were used for the fabrication of residue-free burnout molds to print the patterns. Once printed, the wax patterns were checked for marginal fit and adaptation into the prepared printed model before investing (Figure 10). This alternative technique may be used when a milling machine is unavailable, although 3D printer parameters and post-cleaning and curing protocols should be followed as indicated by the manufacturer to achieve optimal marginal adaptation.7
A zirconia-reinforced lithium-disilicate press ceramic system (Vita Ambria®, VITA Zahnfabrik, vita-zahnfabrik.com) was selected as the restorative material because of its high flexural strength and its availability in translucent and high translucent levels.8,9The restorations based on the printed patterns were pressed and finished in preparation for intraoral placement (Figure 11). Once the restorations were received, dry and wet try-ins were conducted under relative isolation to check the marginal fit, preparation adaptation, and shape. Restorations were tried in with a light paste (Variolink® Esthetic LC Try-in +, Ivoclar, ivoclar.com) for a detailed esthetic and phonetic evaluation.
After the patient's esthetic approval, the restorations were removed and rinsed with air-water, followed by 5% hydrofluoric acid-etching for 20 seconds (Figure 12).8 A specific cleaner (Ivoclean®, Ivoclar) was applied to the intaglio surfaces of the restorations to ensure the surfaces were free of residues (Figure 13). A silane coupling agent (Monobond Plus®, Ivoclar) was then applied to the intaglio surfaces of the restorations for 60 seconds (Figure 14). Adhesive cementation was performed under absolute isolation (Figure 15). The tooth surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds and rinsed with air-water. After air-drying the tooth surfaces, a bonding agent was applied (Tetric® N-Bond Universal, Ivoclar).
The restorations were inserted with a resin cement (Variolink® Esthetic LC, Ivoclar). The cement was light-cured from the labial and palatal surfaces for 20 seconds. After cementation, a water-soluble gel (Liquid Strip, Ivoclar) was used on the margins of the restorations to eliminate the oxygen-inhibited layer and light-cured for 20 seconds (Figure 16). Centric and eccentric occlusal contacts were verified with articulating paper.
Final intraoral and extraoral images showed the integration of the restorations to the soft tissue with natural morphology and texture while also demonstrating dentofacial harmony (Figure 17 through Figure 21).
Discussion
The present technique describes a workflow using a new pressable zirconia-reinforced silicate ceramic. The use of CAD/CAM additive systems for fabricating wax patterns has been found to improve the marginal fit of pressed restorations compared to conventional wax pattern fabrication.2,5 This improvement in marginal fit is crucial for ensuring the longevity and success of the restorations, as a precise fit helps to prevent microleakage and secondary caries.6 Additionally, the use of CAD/CAM systems eliminates several limitations of the conventional waxing technique, such as human error and inconsistencies in wax pattern production.6,10
Furthermore, 3D printing of wax patterns has been demonstrated to be more accurate than conventional hand-formed and milling production of wax patterns in terms of marginal and internal fit.11 This increased accuracy is attributed to the precise control and repeatability of the 3D printing process, resulting in wax patterns that closely match the digital design.12 The improved fit of the wax patterns translates to better-fitting restorations, reducing the need for adjustments and improving overall clinical outcomes.
In addition to the advancements in wax pattern fabrication, zirconia-reinforced silicate ceramic, such as the one used in this case, offers improved strength and durability for restorations.9 The incorporation of zirconia reinforcement enhances the flexural strength of the ceramic, reducing the risk of fracture or chipping.13 This increased strength is particularly beneficial for restorations in high-stress areas, such as posterior teeth, where durability is crucial for long-term success.
Moreover, the zirconia-reinforced silicate ceramic exhibits excellent esthetic properties, including natural translucency and color stability.14 These optical characteristics allow for restorations that closely mimic the appearance of natural teeth, enhancing patient satisfaction and esthetics.
Conclusion
The print/press technique for fabrication of zirconia-reinforced lithium-disilicate dental restorations offers advantages in terms of convenience, precision, and improved mechanical properties. The use of digital systems, including 3D printing, allows for highly accurate fabrication of wax patterns and definitive restorations. Further research and clinical studies are needed to evaluate the long-term success and clinical outcomes of this technique.
About the Authors
Jose Maria Ayub, DDS
Visiting Scholar, Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Telmo Santos, CDT
Laboratory Technician, XD Digital Dental Lab, Miami, Florida / Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Mauricio Figueredo, DDS
Private Practice, Montevideo, Uruguay
Julian Conejo, DDS, MSc
Assistant Professor, Clinical Restorative Dentistry, and Director, Chairside CAD/ CAM Dentistry, Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Markus B. Blatz, DMD, PhD
Professor of Restorative Dentistry, Chair, Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, and Assistant Dean, Digital Innovation and Professional Development, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
References
1. Phark JH, Duarte S Jr. Microstructural considerations for novel lithium disilicate glass ceramics: a review. J Esthet Restor Dent.2022;34(1):92-103.
2. Homsy FR, Özcan M, Khoury M, Majzoub ZAK. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(4):530-536.
3. Mounajjed R, M Layton D, Azar B. The marginal fit of E.max Press and E.max CAD lithium disilicate restorations: a critical review. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(6):835-844.
4. Azar B, Eckert S, Kunkela J, et al. The marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns: press vs. CAD/CAM. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e001.
5. Taha D, Nour M, Zohdy M, et al. The effect of different wax pattern fabrication techniques on the marginal fit of customized lithium disilicate implant abutments. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(9):1018-1023.
6. Guess P, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, et al. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. J Dent. 2014;42(2):199-209.
7. Conejo J, Santos T, Tikreeti A, et al. The computer aided design/press technique: fabrication of zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate restorations for treatment of extensive noncarious cervical lesions. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(5):763-768.
8. Blatz MB, Conejo J, Alammar A, Ayub J. Current protocols for resin-bonded dental ceramics. Dent Clin North Am. 2022;66(4):603-625.
9. Elsherbini M, Sakrana AA, Amin RA, et al. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(5):90-99.
10. Nokar S, Hendi A, Hemmati YB, Falahchai M. Use of digital-conventional method for managing a patient with severely worn dentition: a clinical report. Case Rep Dent. 2018;2018:8456143.
11. Guachetá L, Stevens CD, Tamayo Cardona JA, Murgueitio R. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate veneers fabricated via a manual waxing technique versus a 3D printed technique. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(4):715-720.
12. Keshvad A, Hooshmand T, Asefzadeh F, et al. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques. J Prosthodont.2011;20(7):535-540.
13. Zhang Y, Lee JJ, Srikanth R, Lawn BR. Edge chipping and flexural resistance of monolithic ceramics. Dent Mater. 2013;29(12):1201-1208.
14. Vasiliu RD, Porojan SD, Bîrdeanu MI, Porojan L. Effect of thermocycling, surface treatments and microstructure on the optical properties and roughness of CAD-CAM and heat-pressed glass ceramics. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(2):381.
